tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post8014385728771771213..comments2023-09-25T04:07:32.693-06:00Comments on Joe's Makerbot: Makerbot VS Mojo Showdown3dpprofessorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09302309534971264219noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post-54890008694196778432013-08-09T11:05:57.050-06:002013-08-09T11:05:57.050-06:00For reliability the Mojo is leaps and bounds above...For reliability the Mojo is leaps and bounds above the home options. Almost 100% success. It detects filament, you can reload half way thought a print, 100% supports and heated chamber so almost never is delamination a problem. You're defiantly paying for the reliability of a Mojo.3dpprofessorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09302309534971264219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post-80283106834183289932013-08-09T10:54:24.974-06:002013-08-09T10:54:24.974-06:00I have to add one very very important condition......I have to add one very very important condition... for 1 off pieces this may seem good. However, what i'm interested to find out is, out of 100 prints, does the Mojo3D fair better in terms of reliability as compared to the Makerbot? What is the success rate of the prints? <br /><br />To me, reliability and consistency is more important than cost, if you lose a client due to reliability, the confidence placed in you drops by a value which is hard to put a price tag to (since you need to spend more time and more effort rebuilding reputation)<br />The Portfolio Managerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00599612325244682276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post-11108512171869669862012-10-04T17:25:01.567-06:002012-10-04T17:25:01.567-06:00Thanks for this comparison... it's pretty fasc...Thanks for this comparison... it's pretty fascinating how close a call it is, given the price difference of device and materials!<br /><br />The Mojo I saw in operation was, if anything, slower than my Replicator. But that wasn't a head-to-head comparison. Just watching the rate of noodle-drop qualitatively. Maybe it was, say, 30mm/s? Ish?<br /><br />Adanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15655675016258056168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post-28132297040072901982012-10-04T13:01:28.322-06:002012-10-04T13:01:28.322-06:00Ah, good question. And the answer is... I'm no...Ah, good question. And the answer is... I'm not really sure. It only took me a couple hours to print it, it took them 3 days, but that's because it was their first print and they were having new machine pains. But I think that would be an interesting test to follow up with.3dpprofessorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09302309534971264219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1044435882628584601.post-108449092358104622012-10-04T12:38:02.889-06:002012-10-04T12:38:02.889-06:00What was the difference in time-to-print?What was the difference in time-to-print?Garyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14609755960449568786noreply@blogger.com